Octave is Matlab clone, in fact Octave developers openly say that except for some special cases, any difference between Octave and Matlab is a bug. The biggest

Octave is Matlab clone, in fact Octave developers openly say that except for some special cases, any difference between Octave and Matlab is a bug. The biggest difference between Matlab and Octave is JIT compiler in Matlab, which does incredibly good job at vectorizing simple (or sometimes even not-so simple) loops. I think it's fair to say that Octave performance is very close to a Matlab in a pre-JIT time. There's also a huge difference in toolboxes, profiling, sparse matrix operations, parallel computing and many-many more. In these areas I'm afraid Octave is light-years behind Matlab. However, you still can do a lot of useful simple stuff with Octave and it's free! Matlab-like syntax is really, really cool then it comes to vectorized operations. So probably these two reasons determined Andrew Ng's choice of Octave as a main environment for ml-class. Huge win for Octave I guess. This might spur some interest in the development, attract new people to the product. I think it's a well-deserved success for John W Eaton and other people who develop(ed) Octave all these years.