4 ms·

Mozilla seems to have come around with WebMIDI, so thats a good step in the right direction. The functionality is not limited to device APIs, it covers every a

Mozilla seems to have come around with WebMIDI, so thats a good step in the right direction. The functionality is not limited to device APIs, it covers every aspect of the browser. See: https://open-web-advocacy.org/walled-gardens-report/#hobbled-competition-even-within-safari-clones https://open-web-advocacy.org/walled-gardens-report/#hobbled... and https://open-web-advocacy.org/walled-gardens-report/#missing-functionality https://open-web-advocacy.org/walled-gardens-report/#missing...

dmitriid 4y ago
> Mozilla seems to have come around with WebMIDI And yet, we are in a thread about WebBluetooth. Both Safari and Mozilla have the same stance: until a proper solution for privacy issues with hardware specs is found, we oppose them. For WebMIDI it seems Mozilla has found a solution they are happy with. I wouldn't hold mu breath for others. The links you provided assume Mozilla is in on Apple conspiracy, too. It's also a very one-sided take which completely ignores the elephant in the room. See this: https://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2021/08/breaking_the_we.html https://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2021/08/breaking_th...