3 ms·
What Gato shows is with the proper datasets and training we can achieve general purpose like results. It doesn't show any sort of learning behavior. So your per
by joshcryer 4y ago
What Gato shows is with the proper datasets and training we can achieve general purpose like results. It doesn't show any sort of learning behavior. So your personal home robot may be able to dice up an onion, but it is not going to sit down at your computer, look up its own schematics, and start learning about its existence.
It doesn't have the active working memory to do so.
- moffkalast 4y agoAnd frankly that's exactly what we need. When you really think about it the whole concept of self awareness is ultimately pointless for solving problems, and is mostly counterproductive. Diced onions > existential dread.
- pmontra 4y agoFrankly I'd sleep much better with a great but dumb AI onion cutter in my kitchen than with one that does who knows what during the night. There are already billions of humans that can surprise me sometimes in unpleasant ways. No need to add artificial beings to the list. That said, true strong AI would be a wonderful achievement (/understatement) but I'm happy with useful partial results, like a 787 or a bird sized drone compare to an actual artificial pterodactyl or pigeon.
- pyinstallwoes 4y agoIsn’t that simply a matter of computational resource? Learning is a limit of frequency and time taken between events.