I think there's a fairly huge difference between pointing out an exact attack on the primitive you propose versus dogmatically rejecting it because it's not com

I think there's a fairly huge difference between pointing out an exact attack on the primitive you propose versus dogmatically rejecting it because it's not commonly used. For one, it's possible to have this discussion and arrive at an obvious conclusion (attack does not apply). First of all: try to understand what you read I didn't read your blog post, as I clearly stated at the beginning :-)