> These are the same things that can cause a traffic accident for a human with human eyes, so there's really no logical reason to assume that you can create a m

> These are the same things that can cause a traffic accident for a human with human eyes, so there's really no logical reason to assume that you can create a more performing and safer computer driver by emulating human vision only. Okay. This is a concrete claim that I think is falsifiable. I'll give not just one, but multiple arguments. Argument 1: Connect Four, Chess, Checkers, Go, Limit Hold'em, No Limit Hold'em, Poker, DOTA, and Starcraft II are all examples of games in which AI outperforms even the best humans despite having equal sensory access. Driving can be reduced to a problem comparable to playing an imperfect information game and we can play imperfect information games at superhuman levels using computers. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that even human-level sensory access can enable safer than human performance. Argument 2: Currently we have statistics on driver-assistance programs that demonstrate that human + technology assistance is superior to human alone. This holds true even in cases in which those assistance technologies are only using vision. So we have a contradiction. If it wasn't possible to do better than human with only human senses, we wouldn't be able to point to many different situations in which driving with an AI clearly outperforms humans, but we can. For at least those subsets of AI driving, we can say that an AI driver will outperform humans. > I can't understand why they removed radar. Check out https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6bOwQdCJrc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6bOwQdCJrc for a very detailed breakdown of why they did it.