3 ms·
She disagreed with the constitutionality of the decision. Not with the premise of abortion. For her not to overturn it would be a pretty significant compromise
by upsidesinclude 4y ago
She disagreed with the constitutionality of the decision. Not with the premise of abortion.
For her not to overturn it would be a pretty significant compromise of integrity.
The fact that something can be unconstitutional does not mean the same thing is illegal.
It is not of federal jurisdiction to set the precedent on the matter.
Every pro-abortionist seems to casually brush aside the fact that this has more to do with federal power than abortion