6 ms·
Also horses that could run at 100mph for 5 hours at a time would be far better than early cars. They run on clean renewable fuel, have built in natural intellig
by dismantlethesun 4y ago
Also horses that could run at 100mph for 5 hours at a time would be far better than early cars. They run on clean renewable fuel, have built in natural intelligence to avoid crashes and carry drunk drivers, and come in a variety of pleasing colors (not just black!).
The main benefit of cars was that if you delay maintenance your transportation doesn’t die.
- SoftTalker 4y agoThe emissions weren't so pleasant, however!
- 6510 4y agoBut you do get self replication. Try wrapping your head around that feature.
- MichaelZuo 4y agoBy the time any consumer product offers self replication as a feature, would anyone even remember what smartphones were?
- cco 4y ago> The emissions weren't so pleasant, however! Do you mean from cars or horses? If the former, early automobiles were far cleaner than the animals they replaced (and still are). Cities faced huge issues with animal excrement and cars represented a cleaner alternative.
- bigDinosaur 4y agoObviously you can't do such a simplistic direct comparison between horse emissions and car emissions. How does leaded petrol play into this comparison, particulates, etc.
- cco 4y agoYou're totally right, my comment was far too simplistic. However it captures the feelings at the time, cars at that time were far "cleaner" in that they smelled a lot better, did not clog streets with excrement etc Obviously play the car out a few decades and the emissions were _not_ so clean.
- frosted-flakes 4y agoDo you mean 10 mph?