4 ms·
Bitcoin is money, it doesn't try to be anything. It has succeeded far beoynd any expectations. Not true. Tether should have USD equivalent reserves, but I don'
by Geee 4y ago
Bitcoin is money, it doesn't try to be anything. It has succeeded far beoynd any expectations.
Not true. Tether should have USD equivalent reserves, but I don't care about them. I don't care if they go bust.
- rglullis 4y agoHow can you say that it works as money, if (e.g) when Tesla announced they were accepting BTC for payments, but they would not return the same amount of BTC if a return request was made and the price of BTC changed since the payment? > Tether should have USD equivalent reserves Should, but they don't. At least since 2019 they already dropped all pretenses of having USD to back all USDT they minted. With the bull run started in 2020, they've used it as justification for all their wild minting with the price of the BTC. Whenever the price of BTC started to go down, they would "miraculously" mint a bunch of USDT and use to buy more BTC - in a clear attempt of market manipulation. You are saying you don't care if they go bust, but you should at least be honest with yourself and be open to the possibility that all the market for crypto is built on a lie. The upcoming crash will be entirely on them.
- Geee 4y agoYes, I know it's volatile and has practical issues. It gets better every day, because it's just a matter of maturing in the market. The primary purpose of money is to be a store of value, which it has done very well, from 2009 to this day. USDT minting means that someone buys USDT with USD. There's nothing funny going on. Most of the USD in this market is invisible, because it's on exchanges, not in stablecoins. There's also USDC and BUSD, which are combined as big as USDT. I hope Tether falls, if that means cheaper Bitcoin.
- rglullis 4y ago> USDT minting means that someone buys USDT with USD. No, it does not. Even themselves admitted it. They have minted before just based on the "value of their reserves", which no one can really verify. If you continue with arguments that are provably false and blatant circular logic, I think I am done here.