4 ms·
I have always found that double quotes were good enough to specify inclusion and I did always use '-' to specify omission. Thinking about that, I do now get you
by adhipg 15y ago
I have always found that double quotes were good enough to specify inclusion and I did always use '-' to specify omission.
Thinking about that, I do now get your use case.
Can Google try and make + a double operator? We know that G+ only allows you to have your real names on your profiles and the '+' for G+ is to specify a person. Maybe Google will treat the '+' as a G+ only if it has a relevant profile to show and otherwise leave it like it is?
- jaylevitt 15y agoThat actually seems like something that Google should be good at. In "The Plex", they talk at great length about the bigram/trigram problem (New vs. New York vs. New York Times) and the context of deciding when you're searching for a person versus a term.