3 ms·
> It's been available for many years, but has never been trendy, despite its unique design and strengths. I recommend giving it a spin! I was a heavy TiddlyWik
by lr1970 4y ago
> It's been available for many years, but has never been trendy, despite its unique design and strengths. I recommend giving it a spin!
I was a heavy TiddlyWiki user in the past but moved away from it precisely because of its singe-HTML file design. Modern browsers like chrome made it virtually impossible to save an edited page. Not TW's fault per se, but ruined my experience with it. There is a way to install TW-5 with node.js as a directory tree but my ship has sailed. Now I am a happy obsidian user.
- rpdillon 4y agoYes, that aspect of the design makes it feel like a toy, which is a shame. I've written my own tooling for saving to bridge this gap. It's a Python script that provides a response to an OPTIONS call so Tiddlywiki's native WebDAV support allows seamless saving. It also provides automatic backups and an index page to serve multiple wikis. I've used it for my last two jobs and in my personal life and I'm really happy with it. I hope to make it available publicly in case others find it useful, just haven't gotten around to it.