3 ms·
I wish a real competitor would have emerged earlier, honestly, if only to get the Google Reader team to do something interesting. The truth is that Reader has b
by joebadmo 15y ago
I wish a real competitor would have emerged earlier, honestly, if only to get the Google Reader team to do something interesting. The truth is that Reader has been the de facto standard, but ugly, clunky, and with a somewhat random and randomly expanding feature set.
I've tried everything else in the vain hope that it'd be better, but nothing ever is.
To me, this seems like the worst time to try to compete. Google's entering a user-focused phase, with changes that are largely better for most people. Are the obstinate change-hating refugees really the user base you want?
how do you rope up all the hardcore google reader users into one place, and get them to share with one another.
This doesn't make any sense to me. Even hardcore google reader users have, I imagine, very different interests. Why would you assume they automatically make up some sort of community?
G+ seems like a much better platform to make communities on top of, since you can easily direct your content.
Also, it seems like Google+ is becoming a platform. If Reader becomes an RSS wielding inteface for that, I imagine they'll release public APIs on top of which it would be easy to make an alternative UI.
- voidfiles 15y agoRight, Google Reader won't ever be for the masses. That is exactly why another company can swoop in. Google is a company for the 90%, but 10% is still big enough to make a successful company.
- cake 15y agoI've given up on hoping Google Reader would improve (where are my filters !, read later list, advanced search...). There's a whole team at Google behind it, I wonder what the hell they are doing. Most of the Google Reader I know (and I was there almost since the beginning) is the same since 5 years. I can't find any serious competitor, Newsblur is good but it's still too young...