As far as I can tell, your argument is: 1. There is no evidence that women on boards yield better outcomes 2. Even if they led to better outcomes, it's wrong to

As far as I can tell, your argument is: 1. There is no evidence that women on boards yield better outcomes 2. Even if they led to better outcomes, it's wrong to act on it. 3. Markets are efficient and therefore don't allow for discrimination Re: 1, I don't know Re: 2, I believe that there is a place for affirmative action, especially in places like the boardroom where physical aspects of gender differences have no meaning. Re: 3, There's plenty of evidence showing places where markets are discriminatory in preference to being efficient: https://danluu.com/bad-decisions/ https://danluu.com/bad-decisions/