2 ms·
I thought they already had yjit, which is much much better these folks were doing years ago. Looks more like a big namedropping event to get better yjit buy-in
by rurban 4y ago
I thought they already had yjit, which is much much better these folks were doing years ago. Looks more like a big namedropping event to get better yjit buy-in from ruby-core
- chrisseaton 4y agoNo, YJIT is separate to this, as the article says. This is about the new garbage collection effort, a new option for a JIT, and making interpreters faster.