If such law is effective and useful then we should use it in a gender neutral way in all places where gender segregation exist. A good verification that a law i

If such law is effective and useful then we should use it in a gender neutral way in all places where gender segregation exist. A good verification that a law is good is when the usefulness of the law remain the same regardless of whom it is targeted against or whom favors by it. Few laws got removed faster then when one such law was tried in Sweden, and the argument was the exact same thing as in California. No one likes discrimination, and when the "wrong" demographic benefited the political support goes into negative. Sweden has a worse gender segregation than US, and at the extreme end you got profession and educational programs that are practically single-sex. Gender quotas would force a change of habits, but you won't find much political support for it. Would even you be a supporter if it was used as a general tool against gender segregation?