Read the opinion for Roe. It wasn’t privacy exactly. Rather, the court wasn’t actually sure it was freedom/autonomy or privacy. Both the 9th and 14th amendments

Read the opinion for Roe. It wasn’t privacy exactly. Rather, the court wasn’t actually sure it was freedom/autonomy or privacy. Both the 9th and 14th amendments are argued. The 10th is not mentioned, which if we steelman the argument, must be. A bit of a nitpick, but the reason Roe has been considered to have “shakey limbs” (see Ginsberg’s comments on the case) is the court was ambiguous on why it was decided as it was.