2 ms·
I dont get how you got 2mil hours. There's 40m people in California. This seems to take 2 hours or less. Are you saying 1.25% of Californians are bartenders?
by rektide 4y ago
I dont get how you got 2mil hours. There's 40m people in California. This seems to take 2 hours or less. Are you saying 1.25% of Californians are bartenders?
Your accusation that this could hurt seem yet again wildly vastly hard to imagine. I dont appreciate this absurd anti-governance shade-casting, with seemingly totally bogus figures. I just dont get what drives this weird afactual spin.
- zamadatix 4y agoThe article is the source of the claim and as it points out it's not "bartenders" in the traditional sense of "a person working behind a bar" it's any employee which can takes order for/serves/delivers alcohol or checks IDs or who manages/supervisors those that could in one of the 56,000 establishments licensed to do so in California. I could definitely see that being ~1% of the population, or at least a significant fraction of it.