> I doubt that the court decision means that if you give someone a Debian DVD-ROM at a party (let's pretend for a second people still do that) you are now oblig

> I doubt that the court decision means that if you give someone a Debian DVD-ROM at a party (let's pretend for a second people still do that) you are now obliged to do additional things for them by a contract. Civil law is meaningless without a willingness to engage in litigation; you aren't obliged to do additional things because nobody would spend money that way. As a result, I think this example muddies the waters rather than clarifying anything.