3 ms·
when we say the overall turning point is a few decades away, under most assumptions that don't involve massive war or pestilence or ecological collapse, even wi
by ACow_Adonis 4y ago
when we say the overall turning point is a few decades away, under most assumptions that don't involve massive war or pestilence or ecological collapse, even with a substantial drop in fertility, my child(ren), by the time they are old, will still be living in a world with higher total population than the current one.
we are basically in no risk of running down the population within any of our lifetime...
... on the proviso that everything doesn't go pear- shaped.
And with a recognition that those risks of things that might go pear-shaped are probably highly correlated with the carrying capacity of the planet with regards to human population numbers.
- rad88 4y agoPlanetary "carrying capacity" is not at all well defined. It depends on too many things like natural developments (think year 536), how the economy is organized, and powered, where and how many nukes have exploded, the quality of life, unforeseeable technological and scientific developments, dynamical ecosystems, ... So I'm curious what you mean by it? And how can you declare there's "basically no risk" when we still have superpowers with atom bombs going to war?