2 ms·
If your main value-add was a bridge between sales and engineering, then you didn't add much value and I guess I'm glad that is going away. I never viewed PM as
by jpadkins 4y ago
If your main value-add was a bridge between sales and engineering, then you didn't add much value and I guess I'm glad that is going away.
I never viewed PM as that. I always thought it was a person who understood how the tech works, and understood real world problems.. and helped create real solutions to real problems with tech.
Also, design by committee is awful.
- drewcoo 4y ago> main value-add was a bridge between sales and engineering Disclaimer: I've known great product folks (of different titles) and I don't mean this in a mean way. In ancient times there were makers and sellers. Product folks disrupted ths crusty old business model by inserting themselves between existing players and facilitating. By both making those interactions easier and by creating a place for themselves. Now, that's normal. What are the current boundaries to disrupt? Or did that already happen with people like certified scrum masters? > design by committee is awful Sure, but design by designers is startlingly rare.