4 ms·
Very small compared to coal draglines like "big muskie" Why make a mere train to eventually make a building, when you can make a large building that moves? ht
by VLM 4y ago
Very small compared to coal draglines like "big muskie"
Why make a mere train to eventually make a building, when you can make a large building that moves?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Muskie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Muskie
Interesting to think that Big Muskie was significantly larger in all dimensions than the residence hall I lived in for my first year of university. One machine moved more material than two panama canals in its lifespan...
Big Muskie was not a fast mover but it could have made that proverbial 400 mile trip in about 5 months, which isn't all that bad. I do believe it would have cost more overall, which is why they didn't do it this way. I would imagine trying to ford a river with Big Muskie would have been very exciting indeed.
- LargoLasskhyfv 4y agoStill digging... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bagger_293 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bagger_293
- jacquesm 4y agoDifferent continent.
- LargoLasskhyfv 4y agoSame Planet.
- Severian 4y agoit wouldn't have made it, as it ran off of electric power. It trailed a huge electrical cable. Which makes sense as it was operated by American Electric Power. You can visit the bucket at Miners' Memorial Park where it's on top of a hill ( which I have to visit to get cell service when I camp nearby). It's the size of a small house.