7 ms·
It’s very new to us, why would we assume we have a perfect system for understanding it? It isn’t a toy to play with. Far more scientific research is needed befo
by bowsamic 4y ago
It’s very new to us, why would we assume we have a perfect system for understanding it? It isn’t a toy to play with. Far more scientific research is needed before it’s safe to do in a secular context.
- taeric 4y agoIsn't this true of all frames? I feel that I could claim the same for science and religion as things, as well. Note that I'm fine pushing for caution on folks wanting to take up any practice. This would go as well for folks that think a running practice will help them. Maybe. At best.
- bowsamic 4y agoI think we should treat it like a psychedelic treatment
- taeric 4y agoIn what way?
- bowsamic 4y agoIt should be done only under a very experienced guide
- taeric 4y agoWhat sort of accreditation process do you put forth for the guides? My gut is that the vast majority of the experienced guides out there are also terrible and unlikely to dramatically alter the outcomes. Unless we are in a scotsman debate about "true guides would prevent bad outcomes." :(