3 ms·
Yours is a fair question. Theories: * Cheaper to invest in your tools than overhauling your people/codebases/etc * Sense of wanting to give back to your core t
by russtrotter 4y ago
Yours is a fair question. Theories:
* Cheaper to invest in your tools than overhauling your people/codebases/etc
* Sense of wanting to give back to your core tooling
* The decision maker(s) for the investment just really love Ruby?
- politician 4y agoTheory #4: The performance is actually fine, but the developers were given a project to improve performance in order to keep them around for hot fixes in a codebase they know well and to mentor junior employees.