>So the statement "In this way the bank could artificially jack up the new company’s price," is the opposite of the truth You're taking issue with at what poin

>So the statement "In this way the bank could artificially jack up the new company’s price," is the opposite of the truth You're taking issue with at what point Goldman Sachs takes their 6-7%, while totally ignoring the main point: Goldman Sachs has engaged in laddering which is considered fraud.