> No. Dogs can't eat cheeseburger Can you add an easter egg that says "No can has cheeseburger"? But in all seriousness, very cool project because as a relati

> No. Dogs can't eat cheeseburger Can you add an easter egg that says "No can has cheeseburger"? But in all seriousness, very cool project because as a relatively new dog owner I am searching "can dogs eat <x>" at least once a week. --- > No. Dogs can't eat dairy products. Is at odds with what it says for milk and cheese > Yes! Dogs can eat banana,bananas. > Yes. Dogs can eat capiscum. This should probably have the footnote of bell peppers is probably fine but don't give your dog hot peppers (I mean, I doubt a dog would eat them) If you search for chili, it recommends against it because of it being really spicy. My understanding is that capiscum is an entire family that ranges from bell peppers up to peppers that will hurt humans. > I caught you! I hope it's just pure curiosity and you weren't going to give your dog a fried [blah blah]. AMAZING. That got me when I saw it in the list. Anyone else has to find it on their own. ;) > Yes. Dogs can eat seeds.Yes, dogs can consume seeds. --- There are some that are the same food (French fries is one I saw three times) but end up at fragmented articles that could be better put together. What could be interesting and valuable, especially since you seem to have a small dataset, is relate words so you can share these presumably hand-written explanations between words / phrases and give more value and nuance so you can focus on making n / 2 high-quality articles rather than having to write n articles. For instance, relating all peppers together (chili, capiscum, hot peppers, bell peppers) so you can discuss why it is ok to give bell peppers but not hot peppers or chili. This would increase how human and valuable it feels so you aren't just running into "Yes, dogs can eat [x]" or "No, dogs can't eat [x]".