3 ms·
I'm also not sure if it is ethical. A good way to frame the question is, "Is it ethical, to take a single alcoholic drink, and then drive?" In both cases, AI d
by powerbroker 4y ago
I'm also not sure if it is ethical. A good way to frame the question is, "Is it ethical, to take a single alcoholic drink, and then drive?"
In both cases, AI driving and single-drink driving, the car operates in a less than optimal way. Occupants of the car are at risk. Other motorists and passers-by are at risk. In both cases, the data collection of AI-coincident accidents and drink-coincident accidents is spotty and anecdotal.
Unlike AI driving, there are lots of tests that show how human performance degrades at each level of blood-alcohol level, and that information is searchable for your average internet-inclined driver.
I would feel better if the government could be an umpire on these technologies and call out the accidents and fault with greater rigor... but I'm not sure that the lack of government involvement and the degree of lethal AI accidents has been reached for the current work, by unpaid crash-test dummies, to be unethical.
- HWR_14 4y ago> A good way to frame the question is, "Is it ethical, to take a single alcoholic drink, and then drive?" I don't see why. I would trust a road full of "I had a single drink" drivers over self-driving cars. Assuming the self-driving cars are all like the current models of trying to use vision, radar, lidar because it's assumed to be a mix of all vehicles. 100% self-driving cars with 5G and a mesh network is a different question.