6 ms·
You are assuming they are reporting actual death numbers instead of suppressing them, which is an assumption I don't know why anyone would make. https://www.fo
by bart_spoon 4y ago
You are assuming they are reporting actual death numbers instead of suppressing them, which is an assumption I don't know why anyone would make.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/georgecalhoun/2022/01/02/beijing-is-intentionally-underreporting-chinas-covid-death-rate-part-1/?sh=33d41a344352 https://www.forbes.com/sites/georgecalhoun/2022/01/02/beijin...
- whimsicalism 4y agoI don't doubt some deaths are underreported, but if they had seen anything close to the death rate & spread & hospital influx as in the US, it would have been obvious from outbound traveler antibody tests as well as just social media reports. The Economist "model" your article relies on is seriously, seriously flawed. It is laughable to see it reported on as if it is ground truth. I highly encourage you to look into the details of how they get the numbers your article is citing.
- lamontcg 4y agoThere's also a "Schroedinger's China" problem here with the argument that China is covering up a massive number of deaths. If they'd already been hammered by coronavirus and covered it up, then they'd have high levels of natural immunity and wouldn't need to be pursuing this zero covid policy.
- slaw 4y agoThey can have high levels of natural or vaccines given immunity and still pursue zero covid policy.