3 ms·
> Of course you could. Just carrying your identity (even an anon one) between applications alone can be useful. You already have that without requiring any buz
by arinlen 4y ago
> Of course you could. Just carrying your identity (even an anon one) between applications alone can be useful.
You already have that without requiring any buzzword-driven marketingspeak.
And if your goal is to stay anonymous, in the very least you'd be using independent dedicated identities in separate services.
- chrisco255 4y ago> You already have that without requiring any buzzword-driven marketingspeak. > And if your goal is to stay anonymous, in the very least you'd be using independent dedicated identities in separate services. It is free to create a new identity on EVM. You just create a new public-private key pair. You can do it right now, in the browser, on the fly. If you want to have different accounts for different platforms (or multiple accounts for the same platform), you would have that ability (that is the case today, in Web3). But, if you want to integrate across platforms, it is far easier if those applications adopt an open, user-owned identity standard (rather than rely on Google or Gmail or Facebook or hotmail).