4 ms·
I'm not sure how is that relevant here? Because if you're trying to say that US is to blame for this war, here's the newsflash: causal relationships and moral
by golergka 4y ago
I'm not sure how is that relevant here?
Because if you're trying to say that US is to blame for this war, here's the newsflash: causal relationships and moral responsibility are not the same thing. Even if you knowingly provoke a criminal to do a crime (for example, by leaving your home unlocked, or by going around a bad neighbourhood in very sexy clothing), it does not in any way absolve him of decision to do the crime.
- Consultant32452 4y agoThe world is not simple good guys vs bad guys. Often it's bad guys vs bad guys.
- golergka 4y agoPainting everyone with the same shade of gray is a more simplistic view of the world, not less.
- Consultant32452 4y agoIn the last 25 years, which country in the world has invaded the most countries and slaughtered the most people in those countries they invaded? NATO/US is a far greater risk to the world than Russia, even if you might think Putin the person is more evil than Biden the person.
- golergka 4y ago> invaded If we're talking about moral side of thins, then this word should be read as "unjustifiably invaded, violating international law" and US haven't actually done it once in the last 25 years. > NATO/US is a far greater risk to the world Only if you invade your neighbours that have defence treaties with US or partake in genocide. Not something that I, or anyone else, minds.
- Consultant32452 4y agoDid you know the US is partaking in a genocide in Yemen as we speak? And committing war crimes with cluster bombs to boot.