3 ms·
That doesn't sound like it's at odds at all. The point of the article is that you should investigate why something was done in the past so that you don't keep r
by hvs 15y ago
That doesn't sound like it's at odds at all. The point of the article is that you should investigate why something was done in the past so that you don't keep repeating the same thing even when it isn't necessary anymore. All of the things in your quote are still required and shouldn't be removed.
- masklinn 15y agoIt's at odds with the title, and in line with the content of TFA. OP used a title which has no bearing in the article he linked.
- mcantor 15y agoWell, "If you don't remember why onions are in there, investigate carefully as to why they were added in the first place, then take 'em out if they're no longer relevant" wouldn't fit in the title!