3 ms·

I'm happy to consider God "natural" if you don't like the term "supernatural" -- the point is that we can definitely conclude that God exists. If that makes Go

• webmaven 4y ago
  Ah, but see, you're basing your conclusion on motivated reasoning and a selective interpretation of the evidence (or lack thereof, in some cases). In short, concluding that God exists is a bit of an iffy proposition that largely relies on a failure of imagination. I prefer to hew to a slightly higher standard, that of demonstrating that God exists.
  • jononomo 4y ago
    Okay, fine -- the existence of life is a demonstration of the existence of God.
    • webmaven 4y ago
      Conclusion not supported by the available evidence, sorry.