5 ms·
> How about poniz schemes ran by governments ? You are ok with that kind of exploitation ? I don't understand what kind of argument you were aiming at. Even if
by arinlen 4y ago
> How about poniz schemes ran by governments ? You are ok with that kind of exploitation ?
I don't understand what kind of argument you were aiming at. Even if your "government ponzi scheme" non-sequitur is taken at face value, what's your point exactly? Do you expect that a type of fraud becomes acceptable if you manage to point out other types of fraud?
- pessimizer 4y agoWelcome to the internet. 1. Claim that X is the same as Y. 2. Assert that Y is Bad. 3. Therefore, X is Good. QED.
- przeor 4y agosimple, if there are no more participants in a govt systems like social security or people dont want to use govt backed money, then it's value will collapse in a one way or another. It means that people who are left in the system are screwed like in any ponzi like systems. P.S. Thanks for downvotes HN on my orginal comment