4 ms·
They define active as having tweeted in the last 90 days. I'm active on twitter, check it every other day, follow @ElonMusk but I don't tweet. Perhaps I'm a un
by ramblerman 4y ago
They define active as having tweeted in the last 90 days.
I'm active on twitter, check it every other day, follow @ElonMusk but I don't tweet. Perhaps I'm a unique case, or their assumptions are a bit off.
Some metrics they consider suspicious (from the article):
1) Accounts that didn't tweet recently
2) Accounts with low number of tweets
3) Accounts with a low number of followers
4) Accounts that didn't set up their own profile image
Lurking != bot, and these data-points would all hit high for lurkers. I'm somewhat suspicious of their results, especially given the results from this pew study suggesting the majority of twitter users don't tweet very much.
25% of Twitter Users Produce 97% of All Tweets: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/11/15/2-comparing-highly-active-and-less-active-tweeters/ https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/11/15/2-comparing-...
- phpisthebest 4y agoI am the same, in fact my account has never posted a thing ever, never liked at thing ever, I just follow people I want to see updates from that is all. I treat it like RSS not Social Media
- phpisatrash 4y agoLook my username
- jacquesm 4y agoWith Twitters' changes to ask people to log in to see most content the number of lurkers probably shot up.
- loceng 4y agoI'm now wondering what % of overall tweets are from that 1/5th of bots. If it's 1-1 then 20% of tweets being from bots isn't great - but it could even be more than that.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- _joel 4y agoSame here I never tweet but follow a few people.