4 ms·

20% bump for the most budget-sensitive option is a crazy increase. Sure it's fine if you only have one, but I'm sure there are many folk who have hundreds

• ihuman 4y ago
  They also introduced a new 10GB (512MB memory) tier that's 20% cheaper than the budget-tier's original $5/month price
  • baobob 4y ago
    $100/hour+ human costs to migrate though right. Imagine downsizing 100 web apps, notifying clients of what's going on, and dealing with random breakages. That's not an hour's work
• Dork1234 4y ago
  How does this compare with prices for AWS/Google Compute Engine/Azure ?
  • electroly 4y ago
    AWS Lightsail was already slightly cheaper than DO, and now it's even cheaper yet.
  • mark_l_watson 4y ago
    You can get a GCP micro VPS for free, “forever”. I have a free VPS always running, and run beefier VPSs as-needed for my personal projects. For my needs, GCP and Colab (sometimes Pro, sometimes free) are convenient and time-savers. You can also get a free Oracle Cloud VPS, and Alibaba provides good cloud value also. Many years ago, I enrolled in Microsoft’s BizSpark program, and if they still do that, check them out. So many good options…
    • selfhoster69 4y ago
      Isn't there terrible bandwidth restrictions for the GCP free tier VMs?
      • mardifoufs 4y ago
        Oracle gives you 10TB of monthly bandwith + a 4 core/24gb ram ARM VM + 1 or 2 (can't remember) 1Core/1GB x86 AMD Epyc core... for free. If you are just looking to get a cloud VM for personal projects, it's by far your best option. It's a bit weird to say considering it's oracle, but there's no catch and no hidden costs. As long as you don't upgrade to a paid account, there's no way to even mess up and get charged
        • js4ever 4y ago
          Limited to 50mb/s ... But yes ... It's free :)
          • mardifoufs 4y ago
            Is that really the case? I just ran the CLI version of speedtest.net and I got way more than the 4Gbps that oracle advertises. Though I only ran the test on ARM, and I know AMD VMs get much less bandwidth. I also wouldn't be surprised if my results aren't representative of real world sustained usage.
    • ptman 4y ago
      Here's a comparison of some free clouds: https://paul.totterman.name/posts/free-clouds/ https://paul.totterman.name/posts/free-clouds/
  • baobob 4y ago
    I've priced up DO as an alternative to AWS on several projects and it has never been cheaper once AWS discounts (reservations, spot) are applied correctly. You need to consume a relatively large amount of bandwidth before DO becomes cheaper, and even then a third party CDN is likely to be a better solution
    • ehutch79 4y ago
      What's the cost at the cross over though? If it switches at $10 worth of bandwidth, or even at $20, is that REALLY that much?
      • baobob 4y ago
        The $5 droplet includes the equivalent of $90 worth of AWS egress, although it is accounted somewhat differently. An equivalent low usage machine on AWS in us-east (t3a.micro - 1GB / shared CPU) on spot instead costs around $2.16, almost 57% less. So this is where bandwidth becomes interesting, especially in combination with an external CDN. Say if you're hosting 100 low volume client sites where each client gets its own instance (sensible security choice), DO you'd be paying $284/mo. more than equivalent AWS config, or you could treat the $284 as a bandwidth allowance, leaving 3.155 TB egress in aggregate across all clients before DO/AWS are breakeven again. If some/many of those client sites consume a lot of bandwidth, the equation quickly changes, but you need to start looking at edge hit rates of an individual application before attempting to make a meaningful comparison. The last project I looked at this for included several high bandwidth sites with good edge hit rates on an external CDNs, and AWS still came in significantly cheaper