4 ms·
You seem to talk in absolutes while I'm just acknowledging there is more than one right answer. And I do have specific real cases from my experience in mind...
by amitport 4y ago
You seem to talk in absolutes while I'm just acknowledging there is more than one right answer.
And I do have specific real cases from my experience in mind... One of a great product that never finished (money ran out, CEO didn't want to provide something that was for "a single customer" as in your words), another of a shitty buggy unmaintainable software that did grow a company from 4 to 100 employees then to an exit and only then came the nice eased-back rewrite.
- Joel_Mckay 4y agoThe 3 year survival odds are about 1:23 for software/services startups, and 1:70 for hardware projects. I have culled many half-arsed options... and the decisions are far from arbitrary. Also, who budgets for a project burning over $100k a month in labor without a detailed plan... lol
- amitport 4y agoI agree with what you wrote here... I just don't see how it relates to what I said. Start-up have terrible survival odds. Decisions should not be arbitrary. There should be a detailed plan.
- xpe 4y agoThat moment when one person recognizes what is happening in a conversation; namely; 1. when two people are "talking past" each other. 2. It isn't only about 'what I'm saying'; multiple streams of conversation can happen at the same time and all be useful and even true