4 ms·
I always informally understood "wet" as something having (excess?) water. In that case, I'd say water is not wet because wetness is the result of adding water t
by probably_wrong 4y ago
I always informally understood "wet" as something having (excess?) water. In that case, I'd say water is not wet because wetness is the result of adding water to something dry, which doesn't apply to water itself.
For water to be wet you'd need "wetness" to be a property you can substract from it, and yet I don't think "dry water" is a concept that exists.
So I'm going with "no".
- yunohn 4y agoTangent: Hydrophobic water - https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1Iya8Dpsoew https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1Iya8Dpsoew
- jwilk 4y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dry_water https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dry_water
- samatman 4y agoI take it you're a sedevacantist and ursine outhouse truther as well?