4 ms·
> it's a lack of urgency from the government and private sector to make sure a medically critical product is available. Yes and no. But mostly no. It's that we
by chiefalchemist 5y ago
> it's a lack of urgency from the government and private sector to make sure a medically critical product is available.
Yes and no. But mostly no. It's that we're optimized for the best case scenario. We're in love with theory, of economies of scale and a world with no pot holes (so to speak).
That's profitable. But it's also ridiculous and stupid.
If Abbot being compromised can lead to this then that smells like a monopoly. Or at least a bad case of cronie capitalism. Three companies is not a rant. It's The Root Problem.
- sigstoat 5y ago> If Abbot being compromised can lead to this then that smells like a monopoly. where "Abbot" means "one facility". what are you going to do, break up the one facility?
- chiefalchemist 5y agoSo you believe the status quo is the best possible answer? You're suggesting we opperate a mission critical application without a disaster plan. We all know that's foolish.