> You can't even do something as simple function chaining. You make this sound like something got lazy about rather than something with major implications for

> You can't even do something as simple function chaining. You make this sound like something got lazy about rather than something with major implications for the language semantics/runtime. Serious question: Would you prefer a) the current generics implementation, b) a runtime capable of code generation, c) generics cannot participate in interface implementation, d) some other option?