Agreed! I want to underline that the avoidance of a nutrient should be based in fact, and I also want to suggest that people examine what facts lay under a giv

Agreed! I want to underline that the avoidance of a nutrient should be based in fact, and I also want to suggest that people examine what facts lay under a given piece of advice. I do not see a clear scientific structure that would serve as a foundation for avoiding cholesterol as a general and default thing to almost always do. I do not see references to any such basis of evidence in the article. And have seen evidence that supports making several rather different conclusions than the article does. There’s also the question of outdated science. Saturated fat was believed to harm pancreatic islet cells. As far as I understand more recent studies, it is the opposite. We can ask ourselves: Is the full picture being re-examined when it ought to? How do we know? How do we know if the author of this article has cared to do that? In short: Is it science?