5 ms·
I take your point, but just about anything would be cheaper than the track and trace program: > The NHS Test and Trace programme has been criticised as an "eye
by dane-pgp 4y ago
I take your point, but just about anything would be cheaper than the track and trace program:
> The NHS Test and Trace programme has been criticised as an "eye-watering" waste of taxpayers' money which did not achieve its objective ... This is despite the programme being pumped with the equivalent of 20% of the NHS's entire annual budget - £37 billion over two years.
https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/nhs-coronavirus-test-and-trace-failures-mps-report/ https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/nhs-coronavirus-test-and-trace-fa...
- mytailorisrich 4y agoWell, that's the point. 37 billion over two years for something is widely described as a failure, but 20 billion for a strategic investment that will deliver for decades? Nope, the market will do it... not. And worse, energy policy (or lack thereof) is changing every 6 months.
- inglor_cz 4y agoIt is my impression that Rolls Royce are now committed to production of SMRs.
- mytailorisrich 4y agoThey announced that they got government funding to develop SMRs. When they have a working and certified SMR we can discuss again...