3 ms·
> But I'm unclear on how that makes the risk profile worse for ships? Gasoline-powered vehicles aren't fueled when loaded onto a ship, so they don't really pos
by armada651 4y ago
> But I'm unclear on how that makes the risk profile worse for ships?
Gasoline-powered vehicles aren't fueled when loaded onto a ship, so they don't really pose much of a fire hazard. However for EVs this is a problem, because it's very difficult to completely drain a lithium battery.
> water for cooling affected vehicles for a couple hours is plentiful. It's a ship after all.
Getting the water to all those vehicles is the hard part. If enough of the EVs catch fire the only realistic way to get that much water to the fire is to get the deck below water level, which tends to be very bad for a ship.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- jccooper 4y agoCars are usually loaded onto a Ro-ro on their own power, and will have some amount of fuel on board. They typically want 10-25% full tanks to account for various contingencies, but I don't know how carefully that's monitored. Given the amount of vehicles in question, probably not that closely, though presumably manufacturers are equipped to be reasonably systematic about fuel fill. Bilge pumps should be able to keep up with firefighting pumps. But, yes, the firefighting pumps won't be able to handle more than several cars on fire.
- chipsa 4y agoLast time I had my car shipped, they checked the fuel level was 1/4 task or less, and made me drive around until it was less than that.