4 ms·
the reason it, that is the idea of hypermedia, died was because you weren't able to achieve the same level of interactivity as you could with javascript-based a
by recursivedoubts 4y ago
the reason it, that is the idea of hypermedia, died was because you weren't able to achieve the same level of interactivity as you could with javascript-based applications, even back in 2005
this was due to the fact that HTML stopped advancing as a hypermedia, as I say in my original comment
htmx and other libraries are attempting to address that by pushing HTML forward as a hypermedia, which allows you to implement more sophisticated user interfaces purely in hypermedia terms:
https://htmx.org/examples/ https://htmx.org/examples/
the hypermedia idea itself is extremely innovative and interesting and, at some level, today's javascript applications are new iterations of an even older idea: client-server based RPC applications, as we built back in the 1980s
- codethief 4y ago> HTML stopped advancing as a hypermedia Nitpick: "media" is plural. The singular is "medium".
- DeathArrow 4y ago>the reason it, that is the idea of hypermedia, died was because you weren't able to achieve the same level of interactivity as you could with javascript-based applications, even back in 2005 But I neither want nor need much interactivity in Web sites. Interactivity is for applications and applications are much better on desktop or mobile than on the Web.