3 ms·
Migrated a small production Node app from Heroku to Render recently due to costs and that security debacle. Render is pretty much on the same level when it come
by krajzeg 4y ago
Migrated a small production Node app from Heroku to Render recently due to costs and that security debacle. Render is pretty much on the same level when it comes to convenience (push-to-deploy, etc.), but they're a bit more limited in what they support. They do have some features that Heroku doesn't have. The migration took me ~1 hour altogether.
- For languages, they support less stuff than Heroku (unless you're willing to do Docker yourself).
- For DBs, they can do Postgres or Redis on their end, other stuff is on you if you need it.
- Out-of-the-box metrics don't include basic stuff such as requests-per-sec or http status codes, so you do have to plug something external in for that.
+ HTTPS on custom domain using LetsEncrypt was a breeze and free.
+ They have "disks", which is a persistent filesystem for your app. Very useful if a normal FS is better than a DB for any of your things (image processing in my case).