> I would also argue that the minimal amount of consumption (let's say, you keep yourself alive, just barely), and maximizing your investment amount, is the bes

> I would also argue that the minimal amount of consumption (let's say, you keep yourself alive, just barely), and maximizing your investment amount, is the best outcome for your future, and is the most efficient allocation of resources. If you always prioritize your future over your present then your sacrifices are wasted—you live your entire life just barely keeping yourself alive and never claim any of the proceeds from your investments for yourself. As I said before, there needs to be a balance. Investment is pointless and wasteful without a plan to eventually consume more than you could have without investing.