3 ms·
Yes. As always, the choice to not use encryption cuts both ways. No secrecy for the sender, but no guarantee of authenticity for the receiver.
by jhugo 4y ago
Yes. As always, the choice to not use encryption cuts both ways. No secrecy for the sender, but no guarantee of authenticity for the receiver.
- Nomentatus 4y agoAnnoyingnoob seems to have the obvious quick and dirty solution: "overwrite" the real signals; obfuscate by sending out a blizzard of false signals to mask the rare true ones.