3 ms·
Right :-) Remembering the lengths a former employer would go to fit code into the 32kB limit of a free dev tool because they didn't want to shell out for the u
by HeyLaughingBoy 5y ago
Right :-)
Remembering the lengths a former employer would go to fit code into the 32kB limit of a free dev tool because they didn't want to shell out for the unlimited paid version.
- ChuckNorris89 5y agoNo offense, but that sounds like a poorly funded company. We had the opposite experience, we paid for IAR since that was the only compiler to generate binary compact enough to fit in the 256KB version of the chip and not have us spend extra to upgrade to the more expensive 512KB SKU. If you're laughing at this, do note that at scale, costs add up significantly even if we're talking about $.50 and a license to a good compiler and debugger can have an amazing return on investment.
- HeyLaughingBoy 5y ago> No offense, but that sounds like a poorly funded company. None taken. Not just poorly funded, but often penny-wise and pound-foolish. That's one of many reasons they're a former employer.