Outrage at mismanagement of public lands is not uncommon amongst those of us who follow the issue closely. I think Paul's emphasis on BAH's financials is meant

Outrage at mismanagement of public lands is not uncommon amongst those of us who follow the issue closely. I think Paul's emphasis on BAH's financials is meant to support the argument that a significant element of the management of a publicly owned resource should not have been handed over to an entity that is driven by profit motive. And signing over authority over pricing and eliminating much of the public oversight was especially inappropriate.