4 ms·
That's not empathy though. The thing is, a lot of folks will get conned over and over, especially as the times change and the cons evolve. You're still thinki
by diob 4y ago
That's not empathy though. The thing is, a lot of folks will get conned over and over, especially as the times change and the cons evolve.
You're still thinking of it as something people can learn, but psychology / history says otherwise.
This is why I say empathy is important. For you, it's obvious. For others, it's not.
In addition, there are other factors at play, like desperation (when you're living paycheck to paycheck, you _want_ to believe there's a way out).
Everyone has different experiences / situations to grapple with, and as a society we should try to help folks find the happy path and protect them. Especially so for those of us who recognize cons!
So I guess I wouldn't understand the "empathy goes both way" statement.
- danielmarkbruce 4y agoI'm saying you need to empathize with folks who want less regulation, ie they are largely well meaning, and it's a valid position. Your points are certainly valid. I don't think either way results in something perfect or even that good.