Hey! I'm one of the maintainers of the project so I thought I would address some of the comments here :) > this feels like a terrifying way to make your infras

Hey! I'm one of the maintainers of the project so I thought I would address some of the comments here :) > this feels like a terrifying way to make your infrastructure entirely implicit and remove anybody's ability to coherently reason about the stuff underneath your application. There's two parts to this. The first is understanding what is happening under the hood since we're automatically provisioning so much for you (subdomain, LBs, DBs, etc.). Right now this is a little opaque, but a dashboard is in the roadmap to give users visibility on what's happening 'under the hood' - showing your provisioned infrastructure as well as how it's all wired up. The second point is about potentially destructive actions - here we're going to be following a 'terraformesque' philosophy where infrastructure diffs are presented to the user and need to be accepted explicitly when deploying (or via a `--auto-approve` flag).