Her actual quote in this article is: “Verified people [could be allowed to] essentially start to ‘edit’ Twitter [in] the same sort of way that Wikipedia is so

Her actual quote in this article is: “Verified people [could be allowed to] essentially start to ‘edit’ Twitter [in] the same sort of way that Wikipedia is so they can add context to certain tweets.” So she is not saying that content should be swapped without warning. She's describing essentially annotating tweets with community-edited Wikipedia articles. Again, not a feasible idea, but she is at least correct that Wikipedia is both community-moderated and also remarkably low in bad information.