11 ms·
If the police have to provide protection to anyone whose doorbell has been rung, then they're going to be very, very, very busy.
by monkey_monkey 4y ago
If the police have to provide protection to anyone whose doorbell has been rung, then they're going to be very, very, very busy.
- HL33tibCe7 4y agoIs this comment deliberately facetious?
- monkey_monkey 4y agoNothing facetious about my comment at all. Many people in Korea have faced far worse threats than having their doorbell rung without getting personal police protection. If this is indeed the new standard for getting police protection, the Seoul police force needs to start a huge recruitment drive.
- gmflkgfds 4y ago
- monkey_monkey 4y agoIt's not a false equivalence at all. If anything, it's surprising that there is even a discussion that he needs police protection.
- Tenoke 4y agoThis is not the reasoning (which I am criticizing) for not protecting them given here and at any rate there are more reasons to think people might wish him harm at this time.
- lm28469 4y agoIt's almost as if there was a much greater context that you deliberately ignored. It's not the "bell ringing" part that's worrying it's the "people lost tons of money and potentially seek revenge" part
- monkey_monkey 4y agoLet's focus on what's actually happening instead of hypothetical threats.